Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Peugeot 308 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Peugeot 308 have the same engine power, but Skoda Fabia torque is 5 NM less than Peugeot 308. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Fabia can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Fabia version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Peugeot 308 2017 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 32 cm shorter than the Peugeot 308, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 610 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1660 litres | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 80 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 308. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 308 (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 308, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`607 kg | 1`825 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`072 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 535 kg | 635 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Peugeot 308. Therefore, Peugeot 308 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 308 has
| |