Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 0.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia and Renault Clio are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 443 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 87 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Clio scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Clio scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |