Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Kia Ceed) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 41 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Kia Ceed. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1642 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`596 kg | 1`940 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`066 kg | 1`341 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 599 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Kia Ceed is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |