Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Kia Ceed 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Fabia engine produces 5 HP less power than Kia Ceed, but torque is 23 NM more than Kia Ceed. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Kia Ceed 2015 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Kia Ceed 2015 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 24 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 528 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 2 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |