Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Hyundai i30 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai i30) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Hyundai i30. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 32 cm shorter than the Hyundai i30, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1650 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 72 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 255 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`596 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`066 kg | 1`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 590 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Hyundai i30. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |