Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Citroen Berlingo 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen Berlingo 2018 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 14 cm shorter than the Citroen Berlingo, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 38 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 597 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 597 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 530 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2126 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |