Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2018

 
Skoda Fabia
2018 - 2020
Volkswagen Polo
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP150 HP
Torque: 200 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds8.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.65.1
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway930 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.05 m
Width: 1.73 m1.75 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1150 litres1125 litres
Skoda Fabia has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`620 kg1`690 kg
Net weight:1`090 kg1`235 kg
Load capacity:530 kg455 kg
Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 78008400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv