Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Nissan Micra 2017

 
Skoda Fabia
2018 - 2020
Nissan Micra
2017 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP73 HP
Torque: 200 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.1 seconds16.4 seconds
Skoda Fabia is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 37 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.65.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.0 l/100km
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway890 km on highway
690 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.00 m
Width: 1.73 m1.74 m
Height: 1.47 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia and Nissan Micra are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1150 litres1004 litres
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 146 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra.
Gross weight: 1`620 kg1`490 kg
Net weight:1`090 kg1`016 kg
Load capacity:530 kg474 kg
Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Nissan Micra. Therefore, Skoda Fabia is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

low
Skoda Fabia has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 780010 000
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv