Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 95 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.7 | |
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 351 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1125 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`541 | 1`530 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |