Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017

 
Skoda Fabia
2018 -
Volkswagen Polo
2017 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 95 NM95 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds14.9 seconds
Skoda Fabia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.7
Skoda Fabia consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway970 km on highway
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.05 m
Width: 1.73 m1.75 m
Height: 1.47 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 330 litres351 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1125 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space.
Skoda Fabia has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5411`530
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14 4009800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Polo has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv