Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 16 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 65 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Skoda Fabia can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`541 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Fabia scores higher in safety tests, but Suzuki Swift is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Fabia scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |