Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Renault Clio 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Renault Clio) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 16 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 4.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.10 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 301 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1150 litres | 979 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`541 kg | 1`758 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`011 kg | 1`238 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 520 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Clio has
| |