Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Citroen C3 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 95 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Citroen C3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Citroen C3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia and Citroen C3 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 300 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 922 litres | |
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 30 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen C3, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`541 | 1`510 | |
Safety: | |||
The Skoda Fabia scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Citroen C3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C3, so Citroen C3 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 14 400 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Citroen C3 has
| |