Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Kia RIO 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 110 HP | 75 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 121 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.7 seconds | 11.5 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.8 | 3.2 - 6.3 | |
|
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia RIO. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 5 cm shorter than the Kia RIO, 1 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 42 litres more trunk space than the Kia RIO. The Kia RIO may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`585 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Kia RIO has
| |