Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 180 HP | 60 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 - 250 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 16.5 seconds | 10.4 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 7.5 | 4.2 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 315 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`626 | ~ 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |