Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2007
Volkswagen Polo
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 2.01.2 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 54 - 130 HP55 - 180 HP
Torque: 106 - 310 NM108 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 - 18.4 seconds7.5 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.84.4 - 7.9
On average, the Skoda Fabia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres1030 litres
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`647~ 1`663
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 14002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv