Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 130 HP | 75 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 310 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 18.4 seconds | 8 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.8 | 4.8 - 6.8 | |
|
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.52 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Skoda Fabia has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 616 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`647 | ~ 1`463 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |