Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 130 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
Torque: | 84 - 310 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 20.9 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.8 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.96 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1016 litres | 1030 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`579 | ~ 1`530 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |