Skoda Fabia 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Fabia
2000 - 2004
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 2.01.2 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 50 - 130 HP55 - 100 HP
Torque: 84 - 310 NM106 - 240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 - 20.9 seconds10.7 - 17.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.84.5 - 7.4
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m3.90 m
Width: 1.65 m1.65 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres270 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1016 litres1030 litres
Despite its longer length, Skoda Fabia has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. This could mean that the Skoda Fabia uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 14 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`579~ 1`530
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv