Skoda Fabia 2015 vs Skoda Rapid 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.4 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 110 HP | 75 - 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 250 NM | 112 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | 9.5 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 - 4.8 | 3.6 - 5.9 | |
|
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Skoda Rapid. On average, Skoda Fabia equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Skoda Fabia is 23 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1490 litres | |
| Skoda Fabia has 20 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`615 | ~ 1`667 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |