Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 110 HP | 90 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 200 NM | 160 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 15.2 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 4.8 | 4.0 - 4.8 | |
|
On average, the Skoda Fabia petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Skoda Rapid. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 415 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 115 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. The Skoda Rapid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`601 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |