Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Volkswagen Polo 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Skoda Fabia is available only with front wheel drive, while Volkswagen Polo can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, lPG) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 110 HP | 65 - 272 HP | |
Torque: | 95 - 200 NM | 95 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 - 14.9 seconds | 4.1 - 15.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 4.8 | 3.1 - 5.9 | |
Skoda Fabia petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Fabia is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 351 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1125 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Skoda Fabia has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`581 | ~ 1`668 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 13 400 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |