Seat Toledo 2004 vs Volvo V50 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.7 | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1307 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 83 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Volvo V50 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |