Seat Toledo 2004 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Mitsubishi Carisma. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 6 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Carisma, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |