Seat Toledo 2004 vs Volvo V50 2004

 
Seat Toledo
2004 - 2009
Volvo V50
2004 - 2007
Body: HatchbackEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP136 HP
Torque: 320 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds9.6 seconds
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving.
Seat Toledo engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. Despite the higher power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.95.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.4 l/100km
By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle960 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1190 km on highway
830 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.51 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.57 m1.45 m
Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Toledo is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1307 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Volvo V50 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo V50, so Volvo V50 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 28002200
Pros and Cons:
    Volvo V50 has
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv