Seat Toledo 2004 vs Mazda 3 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 635 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |