Seat Toledo 2004 vs Lexus IS 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Toledo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Lexus IS) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Lexus IS is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Lexus IS, but torque is 125 NM more than Lexus IS. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 9.8 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus IS, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Lexus IS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.43 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Lexus IS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 475 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Lexus IS, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Lexus IS has
| |