Seat Toledo 2004 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 28 HP more power than Hyundai Elantra, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine: The Hyundai/Kia 2.0 CRDi engine with the D4EA code is a cast-iron diesel unit introduced in the early 2000s. It is known for solid durability and, when properly maintained, can often reach 300,000–400,000 km. The engine appeared in several versions over the years. Early variants produced around 112 hp with a conventional ... More about Hyundai Elantra 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Elantra, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 85 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Elantra. The Hyundai Elantra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`054 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Elantra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |