Seat Toledo 2004 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 134 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 16 HP more power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Seat Altea, Seat Leon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Magentis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Seat Toledo 2004 2.0 engine: 2.0 FSI engine, part of the EA827 family, features a lightweight aluminum block with cast-iron liners and a unique timing system. A toothed belt drives the exhaust camshaft, while the intake camshaft is driven by a single-row chain, which also integrates with the variable valve timing mechanism. The timing regulator is ... More about Seat Toledo 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 469 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1473 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 31 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. The Hyundai Santa FE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |