Seat Toledo 2004 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2001
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 7 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 850 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |