Seat Toledo 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 85 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 13 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 245 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |