Seat Toledo 2004 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 38 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Volkswagen Caddy, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mitsubishi Eclipse, Chrysler Sebring | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger, but slightly lower. Seat Toledo is 17 cm longer than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 7 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`944 kg | 1`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |