Seat Toledo 2004 vs Kia Cerato 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Kia Cerato is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 3 HP less power than Kia Cerato, but torque is 5 NM more than Kia Cerato. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Cerato is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Cerato. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Cerato gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Volkswagen Caddy, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Cerato might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is larger. Seat Toledo is 12 cm longer than the Kia Cerato, 3 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 228 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1046 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Cerato, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Cerato has
| |