Seat Toledo 2004 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 134 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 32 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Volkswagen Caddy, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Kia Magentis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 469 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1473 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai Santa FE may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`944 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`344 kg | 1`675 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 325 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem more than Hyundai Santa FE. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |