Seat Toledo 2004 vs Hyundai Elantra 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Elantra is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 3 HP less power than Hyundai Elantra, but torque is 5 NM more than Hyundai Elantra. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Elantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Elantra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Elantra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 2 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Volkswagen Caddy, Seat Altea | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Elantra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Elantra, 5 cm wider, while the height of Seat Toledo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1222 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai Elantra, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Seat Toledo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Elantra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Seat Toledo, so Seat Toledo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Hyundai Elantra has
| |