Seat Toledo 1994 vs Toyota Carina E 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 25 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.8 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Seat Toledo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |