Seat Toledo 1994 vs Rover 200 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 50 HP less power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.9 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 10 cm longer than the Rover 200, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 200. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 200 has
| |