Seat Toledo 1994 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 33 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 309 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |