Seat Toledo 1994 vs Kia Sephia 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 68 HP more power than Kia Sephia, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Kia Sephia. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Sephia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine: A reliable engine with a great lifespan, the most common problems are caused by electronics. The engine rarely needs to be repaired, but if it does, it can be expensive as the engine parts are original and ... More about Seat Toledo 1994 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 4 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sephia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Kia Sephia, so Kia Sephia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |