Seat Toledo 1991 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 1 HP more power than Volkswagen Bora, but torque is 4 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.0 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 580'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Beetle | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 6 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1360 litres | 785 litres | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Bora may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Toledo (by 575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Bora, which means Seat Toledo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 1`377 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 403 kg | |
| Seat Toledo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volkswagen Bora. Therefore, Seat Toledo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
| |
