Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 400 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 20 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used also on Rover 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1360 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Toledo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Toledo has 140 litres more trunk space than the Rover 400. The Rover 400 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 400 has
| |