Seat Toledo 1994 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Seat Toledo engine produces 10 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Toledo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.34 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |