Seat Toledo 1994 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 166 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo and Fiat Croma have the same engine power, but Seat Toledo torque is 4 NM more than Fiat Croma. Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.7 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 20 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |