Seat Toledo 1991 vs Volkswagen Golf 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 17.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 11 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Golf engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Skoda Felicia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Golf might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 30 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 685 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`595 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |