Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 45 HP less power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Ford Scorpio. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 35 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |