Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Escort 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 110 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Ford Escort. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
The Ford Escort is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
900 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Escort gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
Seat Toledo is 22 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |