Seat Toledo 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 73 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 132 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is more dynamic to drive. Seat Toledo engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Seat Toledo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
900 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Toledo engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Ibiza | Used also on Toyota Corolla | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Seat Toledo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
Seat Toledo is smaller, but slightly higher. Seat Toledo is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | high | |
Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |