Seat Toledo 1991 vs Kia Sephia 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Seat Toledo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Kia Sephia) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Kia Sephia is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 14 HP less power than Kia Sephia, but torque is 7 NM more than Kia Sephia. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sephia, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 4 cm longer than the Kia Sephia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Kia Sephia, which means Seat Toledo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Kia Sephia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Kia Sephia, so Kia Sephia quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Kia Sephia has
| |