Seat Toledo 1991 vs Fiat Croma 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 26 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Toledo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Seat Toledo is smaller. Seat Toledo is 20 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |