Seat Toledo 1991 vs Ford Escort 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 88 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Ford Escort is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 17 HP less power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Ford Escort. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Toledo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Toledo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
660 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.10 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.35 m | |
Seat Toledo is 22 cm longer than the Ford Escort, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Escort has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford Escort, so Ford Escort quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Ford Escort has
| |