Seat Toledo 1991 vs Rover 400 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 138 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 24 HP less power than Rover 400, but torque is 2 NM more than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.6 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Seat Toledo is 5 cm shorter than the Rover 400, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Toledo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Rover 400 has
| |