Seat Toledo 1991 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Seat Toledo engine produces 18 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Seat Toledo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Seat Toledo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that by driving the Seat Toledo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Seat Toledo is 33 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Seat Toledo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 309 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Toledo has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |